USCs 2004 BCS title will likely be vacated if the school loses its NCAA appeal, BCS executive director Bill Hancock said Tuesday.

Columns Dennis Dodd
Tommy Tuberville eyes lit up when he realized his first national championship could be close. You got my number?” Texas Techs coach asked. “Stay in touch.” Read >> Ray Ratto
The Titans-USC (read: Lane Kiffin) lawsuit is yet one more reminder why Kiffins scorched-sport policy, while completely suicidal, is so much fun to watch. Read >> Kiffin surprised by Titans lawsuit MaxPreps: Robinson tackles HS job

Speaking during the Big 12 media days here, Hancock made the most definitive statement yet regarding Reggie Bushs participation in USCs 55-19 victory over Oklahoma in the 2005 Orange Bowl.

It could cost USC a national championship.

“If USC loses the appeal, the [2004] championship will be vacated,” Hancock told reporters. “And the feeling is in our group, the commissioners group, is that there was not a game, no game happened.”

Hancock added, “They will vacate, they will not elevate anyone,” referring to the 12 school presidents who make up the BCS Oversight Committee.

“The presidents could decide to do something else, but I think its most likely that they will vacate it.”

Hancock said those presidents would reach a decision by consensus, not necessarily unanimously, if USC loses the appeal. It would mark the first time sin that a national championship had been removed.

The oversight committee is made up of one CEO from each of the 11 I-A conferences and Notre Dame.

On June 10, the NCAA vacated 14 victories from USCs 2004 and 2005 seasons as part of the penalties stemming from the Bush investigation. Bush essentially competed while ineligible for two seasons because he had taken money and benefits from marketers trying to win him as client when he turned pro.

Because the NCAA doesnt stage a championship in Division I-A football, it does not control postseason football. The BCS began in 1998 as a way to streamline college footballs national championship race. Human and computer formulas are used to determine the top two teams to play for the national title each year.

During the media days, Texas Tech coach Tommy Tuberville lobbied for his undefeated 2004 Auburn team to be elevated to national champion in the wake of the USC penalties. Auburn finished 13-0 and No. 2 that year.

“Somebody needs to be national champion from that year,” Tuberville told CBSSports.com.

The Associated Press has announced it will not revote the 2004 final poll. However, the Football Writers Association of America is expected to address the issue next week. USC was presented with the associations Grantland Rice Trophy signifying a national championship that year.

The BCS leaders have faced the question of whether to remove USCs championship for years. The NCAA took four years to flesh out all the details. Last week, incoming USC AD Pat Haden announced that the school will return its copy of Bushs Heisman Trophy to the Heisman Trust. The trust was to have met Tuesday to discuss its own decision on dealing with Bushs trophy. A Heisman winner has never had his name removed or been asked to return his trophy.

In NCAA language, a “vacation” differs from a forfeiture. Forfeits not only take away wins from offending school but award them to the losing team. Per NCAA rules regarding vacations, USCs wins and Bushs records will be removed from all NCAA record books and USC media guides. Also, Pete Carrolls wins during that period will not count toward his career total.

USC is not appealing to the NCAA to get any of the wins back. It is trying to reduce the two-year postseason ban to one year. Resolution of the case probably wont be announced until next year.

Posted on July 28th, 2010 by admin
Filed under: College football news, NCAA college football